Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2004)(successfully challenged the requirements for motions to reopen in removal proceedings). • Hill & Piibe, Immigration Attorneys

Home / Notable Cases / Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 11…

Andia v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 1181 (9th Cir. 2004)(successfully challenged the requirements for motions to reopen in removal proceedings).

Meet Our Professionals

Susan E. Hill

Susan Hill leads our practice in appellate litigation before the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, as well as in nonimmigrant visas and other business/employment cases, especially in the equestrian industries. After graduating from Pepperdine Univ… Read More

Alary E. Piibe

Alary Piibe is a long-time litigator who has developed keen and aggressive courtroom skills. Mr. Piibe prides himself on being a formidable strategist who will make persuasive, effective presentations — and who represents his clients in a straightf… Read More

Betzayda Montoya

Betzayda Montoya has long been involved in immigration law, working on a variety of cases across the spectrum. She has experience with employment and family immigration issues, as well as asylum, naturalization and U-visas. She also has a strong back… Read More

View Our Disclaimer | Privacy Policy
Law Firm Website Design by The Modern Firm

This site is registered on wpml.org as a development site. Switch to a production site key to remove this banner.

Practice Areas

Fill Out This Form For an Appointment

Meet Our Professionals

Recent Blog Posts

Contact Us